Adaptive questioning (CAT)
Each next question is picked by skill-graph coverage and information gain — no fixed script, no wasted minutes.
A live, adaptive AI interviewer that probes depth, challenges claims and scores every answer with evidence — across live, recorded and async formats.
AI writes the CV and rehearses the answers, so strong and weak applications read the same. Recruiters end up shortlisting on who presents well, and the first real signal doesn't arrive until the panel — weeks later.
A polished CV and a rehearsed answer tell you nothing about what someone can actually do.
The interview adapts as they answer, so the follow-up is one nobody can prepare for.
Two candidates, two interviewers, two different standards — and no fair way to compare them.
Every candidate gets the same interview, scored the same way, and checked for bias.
Good people drop out while they wait for an interview slot.
They interview when it suits them — text, audio or video — so nobody waits on a calendar.
When a candidate asks why they were rejected, nobody can point to anything.
Every score links to what the candidate actually said, so there is always an answer.
The Interview Agent conducts the conversation, follows the evidence and scores every answer as it goes. What it does not do is decide. Each score stays tied to the exact thing the candidate said, so the hiring decision is made by your team, on evidence they can read for themselves.
Each next question is picked by skill-graph coverage and information gain — no fixed script, no wasted minutes.
A 2-parameter psychometric model pinpoints true skill level and knows when confidence is high enough to stop.
Every answer is scored in-flight, each score linked to the exact excerpt that earned it — with full provenance.
Text, audio or video live; one-way recorded; or a human panel — same rigor in every format.
Listening, reading and speaking assessment built in, for language and communication roles.
Face, gaze and liveness monitoring run alongside, so remote interviews stay defensible.
Builds a personal interview plan from the role, JD and level.
Warm-up, core and stretch — questions adapt live to every answer.
Each answer is scored with evidence while IRT tracks true level.
An evaluator panel produces a defensible, rubric-based recommendation.
No one waits for a slot — a deep, fair interview at any volume.
Evidence-anchored, provenance-tracked scores, audit-ready.
Adaptive probing reaches a reliable read in fewer questions.
Live probing plus integrity monitoring make gaming obvious.
Every interview is scored with psychometric rigor and full provenance — so a hiring decision made on it holds up in front of a candidate, a board or a regulator.
Enterprise-grade security and compliance
From the moment a résumé lands to the moment a gap is closed, a fleet of specialized AI agents and psychometric engines hands your profile to each other — verifying, guarding, scoring and coaching.
Reads the résumé and maps every claim to the skills taxonomy — no keyword guessing.
Turns the role, JD and level into a personal interview plan: warmup, core, stretch.
Runs the live conversation — asks, probes, hints — and scores in-flight with evidence.
Picks every next question by information gain, so no minute is wasted.
IRT psychometrics pinpoint true skill level and know when confidence is high enough to stop.
Walks the skill graph to cover what the role actually requires.
Computer vision watches the session — face, presence, attention — without a human hovering.
Turns risk signals into a clear call: pass, review or suspicious. Auditable.
Re-scores every rubric dimension independently, each score anchored to a quoted excerpt.
Grades open and spoken answers against the author's rubric — with a safe fallback path.
Mints immutable, dated skill proofs and tracks freshness as skills age.
Converts verified gaps into a plan — real courses and videos, then re-verifies the skill landed.
It is a real interview, run by an agent rather than a person. It builds a plan from the role, the job description and the level, then asks, listens and follows up — choosing each next question from what the candidate just said and where the evidence is still thin. Answers are scored as they happen, against the skill the question was asked to test.
No. It replaces the first screen — the repetitive half-hour that gets skipped or rushed at volume. Your interviewers still make the call, but they meet a shortlist built on evidence rather than on who happened to get a slot.
Recruiters set the role and the bar; the agent does the volume; the transcript and scores come back for review. Nobody is asked to trust a number they cannot open — every score links to the answer that produced it, so a recruiter can disagree with it in seconds rather than re-running the interview.
Every applicant is interviewed, because there is no calendar to fill. Volume changes nothing about the depth each candidate gets — the same plan, the same scoring, the same evidence trail, whether it is 20 people or 2,000.
The interview adapts to every answer, so there is no fixed script to prepare against, and the follow-up is generated from what was just said. TrustOS runs face, gaze and liveness monitoring alongside. Rehearsed answers tend to show up as depth that collapses on the second probe.
Identity verification and integrity monitoring run through TrustOS — face matching, liveness and gaze checks during the session, flagged on the report rather than silently failing a candidate. A flag is evidence for a human to review, not an automatic rejection.
Closer to a conversation than a form. They sit it when it suits them, in text, audio or video, and the questions respond to what they actually said rather than marching through a list. They get a full interview instead of being filtered out by a keyword before anyone spoke to them.
Any role where the skills can be named. The question plan is built from the role's skill profile, so engineering, sales, operations, finance and support all work the same way. There is a dedicated communication track (listening, reading, speaking and writing) for language-heavy roles.
Most score the interview and stop. Ours is a measurement instrument: the result is a banded level per skill with a confidence bound and the evidence attached, and it becomes a lasting skill record rather than a one-off hiring artefact. The same measurement is then used for mobility, succession and development.
Every score is anchored to the excerpt that earned it, with provenance, and the ability estimate is IRT-calibrated with a confidence bound. When a candidate asks why, the answer is a transcript rather than a recollection.
Every candidate gets the same calibrated interview and the same rubric, which removes the panel-to-panel variation that drives much of the inconsistency in hiring. Scoring is checked for bias and mapped to standards. If you need a formal independent bias audit for a specific jurisdiction, talk to us about it directly rather than assuming it is in place.
Through a unified connector for the major HRIS and ATS platforms, natively with Zoho Recruit, and over LTI 1.3 for learning systems. Anything else runs on a REST API and signed webhooks — start a session, get the result back.
Recordings, transcripts and integrity checks are covered by our privacy policy, which sets out what is captured, why, the legal basis, who it is shared with and the candidate's choices. On data residency we are led by you: the platform runs in AWS Mumbai by default, and where your rules require the data to stay in a particular region, we deploy there. Residency, retention and the controller relationship are all agreed as part of onboarding.
The work is defining the role and the bar, not the setup — once the skill profile for a role is agreed, that role can be interviewed against. We would rather scope a pilot on one live role with you than quote a timeline that ignores your approval process.
We will not quote you a number we have not measured in your organisation. What we will do is run the arithmetic on your own volumes and screening time, agree what success looks like before the pilot, and measure against it. Anything else is a brochure claim.
It becomes a dated skill proof on the person's record. The same measurement is then used for internal mobility, succession and development, rather than being thrown away once the offer is signed.
Bring us one open role. We will interview for it, show you the evidence behind every score, and you decide what to do with the shortlist.