Performance, mobility & careers
Measuring real contribution when AI inflates output — and moving people well.
5 articles
If AI wrote it, what did the human add?
AI makes everyone's output look competent, which makes genuine human value harder to see — and easy to over- or under-credit. Human contribution is the capability of adding something the model wouldn't have: reframing, insight, high-value correction, ownership. This explains it, its five levels, and how GoMeasure measures the Human Contribution Quotient to support fairer talent decisions.
Read article →
Role, competency, KRA, KPI — and the one layer you're missing
Role, competency, KRA and KPI define what good looks like — but nothing connects the competency a role needs to how much of it a person actually has. Competency lives on paper; the KPI, the only thing you measure, is a lagging signal. The missing layer is the measured skill: competencies broken into skills, measured on evidence to a level and a confidence, against what the role requires. It sits on top of the framework you already have — and it's what makes every hiring, mobility and development decision defensible.
Read article →
Performance vs. capability: why your best performer might have your weakest skills
Your top performer might be your weakest engineer — and your performance system can't tell. A result is inflated by territory, team, tenure and tailwind, so a high rating is consistent with high skill and with a favourable context. This is why context-inflated performance breaks exactly when you lean on it — promotion, succession, reorg — and how to separate capability from context by measuring skill on independent evidence.
Read article →
The hidden cost of not knowing what your people can do
Unreliable skills data doesn't show up as a cost on any report — so it never gets managed. But it's paid for continuously: hiring outside for skills you already have, transformations that stall in execution, training budget spent on gaps that weren't real, key-person risk, and mis-hires. This is where the cost of not knowing what your people can do actually lands, why it stays invisible, and what changes when capability is measured.
Read article →
Performance and skills: why your organisation needs both — and what each one actually does
Performance tells you what someone delivered. Skill tells you what they can actually do. They are not the same thing — a strong result can come from a strong team or an easy territory, and a strong skill can sit behind weak results because of poor role fit. This is why an organisation needs both, what each one is for, and why performance, skill, potential and readiness must be kept as four separate objects rather than collapsed into one rating.
Read article →